One project. Hundreds of dependencies. One accountable decision trail.
When a project slips, the consequences spread across crews, materials, subcontractors, permits and capital. The project manager needs more than a schedule indicator. Mantikon is designed to connect project events and constraints, compare recovery options and preserve a record of why each major adjustment was recommended and approved.
- Design partner trackAvailable for design-partner evaluation, subject to data feasibility and a project agreement.
- Who decidesDeveloper, general contractor, EPC, infrastructure operator
- Typical sourcesBIM models, design documents, schedules, budgets, contracts, procurement status, daily site reports
- 01
Understand the dependency chain
Bring together schedules, cost data, procurement status and site reporting to identify which constraints actually determine the next move.
World model - 02
Debate the recovery plan
Test acceleration, resequencing and procurement alternatives against their effects on time, cost, people and safety. Surface unresolved objections rather than hiding them inside a summary.
Trade-offs - 03
Keep a decision history
Link change orders, approvals and real outcomes to the evidence that informed them.
Ledger
A worked
example
Illustrative scenario, not a customer case.
A subcontractor reports that a delivery of steel structures will be ten days late. Normally the project manager collects information from procurement, the site, finance and the designers, and a new schedule emerges after several meetings.
Mantikon performs the first pass at once. It determines which operations depend on the delayed batch, which of them sit on the critical path and which work can proceed in parallel. The economic agent prices the standstill. The construction agent examines resequencing. The logistics agent evaluates alternative suppliers and delivery methods. The safety agent checks whether the new sequence creates additional risk for the crews and the plant. The legal agent reads the contractual deadlines, the notice procedures and the consequences of a breach.
The result is a small number of scenarios: expedited delivery, partial substitution of materials after engineering approval, reallocation of crews, or an adjustment to the overall schedule. Each arrives with its cost, its duration and its risk. Once approved, Mantikon updates the plan, prepares the corresponding tasks and tracks the actual deviation. The same model extends to portfolio management: cash-flow gaps, cost control, subcontractor coordination and the analysis of why the same delays keep recurring.
For a developer this is a tool for steering an investment project; for a general contractor, a production-planning system; for an infrastructure operator, an environment for controlling a capital programme.
Scope and
measures
Example workflows
Delay-response options · procurement risk · resource allocation · change-order preparation · executive project review.
Evaluation metrics
Schedule variance · time to resolve blockers · rework attributable to decision errors · change-order cycle time.
See how a project decision could be made traceable